Alleged Operator of Tennessee-based Ponzi Expected to Plead Guilty SEC Charges Houston RIA with Running Fraudulent Offering
Categories
- A.G. Edwards (4)
- AARP (57)
- Accounting Fraud (8)
- Accounting Fraud (3)
- Affinity Fraud (27)
- Against Christians (13)
- Aging Parents (64)
- Alabama (4)
- Alberta (3)
- Alberta (1)
- Antigua (1)
- Arizona (2)
- Arizona (6)
- Arkansas (1)
- Auction Rate Securities (1)
- Australia (7)
- Australia (4)
- Australia (1)
- Austria (1)
- Baby Boomers (156)
- Bear Stearns (1)
- Blank Check Companies (1)
- Boiler Rooms (13)
- British Columbia (1)
- British Columbia (1)
- California (64)
- California (31)
- Canada (8)
- Canada (3)
- Cayman Islands (1)
- CDs (6)
- Collateralized Debt Obligations (4)
- Colorado (17)
- Colorado (9)
- Commodities (2)
- Commonwealth Financial (1)
- Connecticut (4)
- Connecticut (1)
- Currency Trading (5)
- Day Trading (1)
- Endowments (3)
- Endowments (1)
- Energy (1)
- Estates (42)
- Fidelity (1)
- Financial Services Authority (6)
- FINRA (21)
- Firms (22)
- Florida (54)
- Florida (28)
- Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (3)
- Georgia (8)
- Georgia (5)
- Gold (2)
- Goldman Sachs (2)
- Green Energy (6)
- Hedge Funds (38)
- Idaho (1)
- Idaho (1)
- Illinois (15)
- Illinois (11)
- Indiana (4)
- ING (1)
- Initial Public Offering (2)
- Insider Trading (27)
- Insurance Agents (1)
- Internet Loans (1)
- Investment Advisers (29)
- Investment Psychology (1)
- Investor Protection (599)
- Investors at Risk (572)
- Iowa (1)
- Japan (1)
- Kansas (4)
- Kansas (1)
- Kay Securities (1)
- KMS Financial Services, Inc. (1)
- Lack of Supervision (7)
- Legislation (3)
- Lehman Brothers (1)
- Life Settlements (1)
- Louisiana (1)
- Louisiana (1)
- LPL Financial (1)
- Market Manipulation (8)
- Maryland (6)
- Maryland (2)
- Massachesetts (2)
- Massachusetts (8)
- Merrill Lynch (3)
- Mexico (1)
- Michigan (15)
- Michigan (8)
- Minnesota (7)
- Minnesota (5)
- Mississippi (1)
- Missouri (1)
- Montana (1)
- Montana (1)
- Morgan Stanley (5)
- Municipal Bonds (3)
- Nebraska (1)
- Nevada (8)
- Nevada (2)
- New Hampshire (3)
- New Hampshire (3)
- New Jersey (10)
- New Jersey (6)
- New Mexico (3)
- New Mexico (2)
- New York (43)
- New York (19)
- North Carolina (4)
- North Carolina (2)
- Ohio (10)
- Ohio (5)
- Oil and Gas (28)
- Oklahoma (1)
- Oppenheimer (1)
- Options Trading (2)
- Oregon (1)
- Organized Crime (2)
- Pennsylvania (9)
- Pennsylvania (7)
- Penny Stock (7)
- Pension Funds (5)
- PIPEs (2)
- Ponzi schemes (250)
- Prime Bank Scams (16)
- Private Equity (1)
- Promissory Notes (9)
- Pruco Securities, Inc. (1)
- Prudential Securities, Inc. (1)
- Pump and Dump (22)
- Quebec (1)
- Quebec (1)
- Real Estate (3)
- Recently Divorced (41)
- Regions Bank (1)
- Retirees (153)
- Russian (3)
- Sales Practice Abuses (30)
- Sarbanes-Oxley (1)
- Scams (622)
- Scandals (35)
- SEC (534)
- Securities Industry (general) (663)
- Senior Citizens (173)
- Serious Fraud Office (7)
- South Africa (1)
- South Carolina (2)
- State Farm (1)
- State Street (1)
- Tennessee (6)
- Tennessee (10)
- Texas (33)
- Texas (14)
- The Vigilant Investor (1)
- UBS Financial (5)
- Unauthorized Trading (6)
- Uncategorized (92)
- United Kingdom (21)
- United Kingdom (4)
- United Kingdom (6)
- Utah (6)
- Utah (6)
- Variable Annuities (10)
- Viatical Settlements (1)
- Virginia (1)
- Wachovia (1)
- Washington (9)
- Washington (7)
- Wells Fargo Securities Inc. (1)
- Wisconsin (1)
Tags
-
Bernard Madoff
Bernie Madoff
broker
Broker Snapshot
Constant Patrol
dealer
due diligence
endowment
financial adviser
financial advisor
fraud
hedge fund
Huddleston
investment adviser
investment advisor
Investor’s Watchdog
Investors Watchdog
Madoff
misappropriation
pension fund
Private Equity
QualifEye
RIA
scam
scheme
SEC
Securities and Exchange Commission
stockbroker
theft
Winnow
Articles
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007







SEC Charges Madoff’s Computer Programmers
Last week the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) charged computer programmers Jerome O’Hara of Malverne, New York, and George Perez of East Brunswick, New Jersey, with helping Bernie Madoff conceal his scam. According to the SEC’s complaint, O’Hara and Perez accepted hush money to help Madoff. Specifically, the SEC alleges that the two men created programs that “generated [...]
Last week the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) charged computer programmers Jerome O’Hara of Malverne, New York, and George Perez of East Brunswick, New Jersey, with helping Bernie Madoff conceal his scam. According to the SEC’s complaint, O’Hara and Perez accepted hush money to help Madoff. Specifically, the SEC alleges that the two men created programs that “generated many thousands of pages of fake trade blotters, stock records, Depository Trust Corporation (“DTC”) reports and other phantom books and records to substantiate nonexistent trading.”
The SEC also alleges that Madoff had a separate computer, called “House 17,” that he used to process investment advisory account data. The SEC alleges that O’Hara and Perez “recognized that the trades being entered into House 17 and the account statements and trade confirmations being sent to investors did not reflect actual trades.” The Commission also alleges that O’Hara and Perez refused to continue helping Madoff in 2006, but that he convinced them to keep his secrets by agreeing to increase their salaries and paying them a bonus of $60,000.”
If you never believe anything else you read here, believe that this kind of cover up is not at all unusual for financial scam artists. It is in the early pages of the Long Con Playbook.
Right now, there are thousands of “long cons” running worldwide. Long cons involve substantial preparation and planning to create the illusion of legitimacy. They aim to take wealthy marks (victims of a scam) for hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars each. In contrast, the “short con” is opportunistic and aims to take a single mark for whatever money he has on his person at the time (think Three Card Monte or The Shell Game).
Long con operators expect you to check them out, to call references, to insist on seeing things with your own eyes. Accordingly, they pay people to pose as satisfied investors and rent the kind of warehouses and offices that you would expect the company to have. What experience qualifies you to tell the real thing from a convincing phony? How many long cons have you investigated? How many con artists have you spoken to? If you want to protect what it took you so long to save, do what banks do: hire private protection.